The more I watch the news coverage of the Schiavo case, the less I understand. Maybe I haven't been following closely enough but can someone explain how a ban on using artificial means of support can include giving water or ice chips by mouth?
Even if I were fully convinced that her wish would have been to have the feeding tube removed, how is that the same as intentionally refusing her anything she is capable of drinking or eating on her own?
Posted by marybeth at March 24, 2005 12:26 PM News